The
story ‘A Jury Of Her Peers’, written by Susan Glaspell begins
repeating back to its readers many of the gendered stereotypical
assumptions women receive from men all their lives. Women are assumed
to be concerned only with trifles, to be unintelligent, inferior to
men and have social limitations placed on them. Yet Glaspell proves
how untrue these comments can be, ultimately portraying women as
stronger characters when they find their own independence. Women use
bonding and moral judgment as means of gaining power and dignity
against men to create new gendered assumptions about their
characters. The assumption that women are concerned only with trifles
is present in ‘A Jury Of Her Peers’. Glaspell reveals this
gendered assumption through the comments passed by the sheriff about
Mrs Wright being “Held for murder and worrying about her
preserves.” Mr Hale than expands on this remark, brushing it off
stating “Women are used to worrying over trifles.” Mr Hale is
implying that women have nothing meaningful or worthwhile to worry
about. Further into the story women are once again ridiculed, this
time for wondering about Mrs Wright’s quilt. The sheriff mocks them
for their intrigue laughing, “They wonder whether she was going to
quilt it or knot it!” The sheriff is implying that women’s lives
revolve around domestic affairs and they are incapable of thinking
about anything else. These remarks show the disrespect from men and
the assumed trifles in women’s lives in ‘A Jury Of Her Peers’.
Glaspell puts forward that women are inferior and it is their duty to
follow men. This can be seen in the very first paragraph as we give
our first impressions on the story. Mrs Hale was expected to leave
with her kitchen “in no shape for leaving: her bread already for
making, half the flour sifted and half unsifted.” She was then
impatiently hurried to not “keep the folks waiting…in the cold.”
This was extreme. My
argument is definitely women empowerment and how our genders can
affect our individual and social identity.
It is great what the women in this story accomplish. However, I am not sure the men in the story are aware of what the women have done. For that reason, I do not believe the men will treat them any differently after the case. This story is written in the '60s, but gender equality issues are still prevalent. Especially since Mansfield recently launched its feminism campaign, this story is relevant to all of our lives.
ReplyDelete